|
LEGAL
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
DOE V.
PARISH
EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY LAWSUIT
TEN
COMMANDMENTS CASE
ARCHIVE CASES
|
|

BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN'T PROTECT ITSELF |
ABOUT US
NEWS/EVENTS
LEGISLATION/LITIGATION
TAKE ACTION
GET HELP
JOIN US
EXTERNAL LINKS
TEN COMMANDMENTS
APPEAL
ARGUED BEFORE TENTH CIRCUIT
The appeal of a 2006 decision by the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma to
retain a Ten Commandments monument on the Haskell County
Courthouse lawn was argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Tenth Circuit in Denver Colorado on October 4, 2007.
Daniel Mach, Director of Litigation for the National ACLU
Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief, presented the oral
argument to the Tenth Circuit. He was advised by Micheal
Salem, an ACLU of Oklahoma cooperating attorney who handled the
case at the District Court trial with former ACLU of Oklahoma
Staff Attorney Tina Izadi.
The ACLU of Oklahoma originally filed the case on behalf of
plaintiff James W. Green, who objected to the placement of the
Ten Commandments monument on the lawn of the Haskell County
Courthouse in Stigler, Oklahoma. Stigler resident Sharon Nichols
acted as the representative on behalf of the ACLU of Oklahoma
membership. The judge at the District Court dismissed the
controversy as a “kerfuffle” and ruled that the monument was not
erected by the County with a religious purpose. The case is
Green v. Board of Commissioners of the County of Haskell.
|