Megan Lambert

Megan Lambert

Legal Director

She/Her

On November 19th, our team will be in Denver, CO for oral argument in front of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in McCraw, et al. v. Oklahoma City, our free speech challenge against Oklahoma’s City's anti-panhandling ordinance. This case is about protecting the freedom of speech for Oklahomans.  


On November 19th, our team will be in Denver, CO for oral argument in front of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in McCraw, et al. v. Oklahoma City, our free speech challenge against Oklahoma’s City's anti-panhandling ordinance. This case is about protecting the freedom of speech for Oklahomans.

In 2016, in reaction to complaints about the visibility of panhandlers in Oklahoma City, the City Council passed an ordinance prohibiting virtually all activity on medians. Not only is the ordinance a superficial reaction to the systemic problem of poverty, but it is also an affront to the free speech rights of all those living in Oklahoma City.

Read below to get more information about circuit court and what we can expect next Tuesday:

What is a circuit court?

  • A circuit court is a federal appellate court. They rehear specific issues from federal district courts and evaluate the decisions of federal district judges within their jurisdiction. Circuit courts serve as the second of three levels of courts in our federal judicial system. The first level is comprised of district courts throughout the country. The second level is comprised of 13 appellate courts, with 12 regional circuit courts and the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. We will be before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears appeals from federal district courts in Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah. The third level in our federal court system is the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court is the only court that evaluates the decisions of circuit courts.

What is oral argument?

  • Oral argument is the in-person presentation of a case to a court of appeals by the attorneys on either side of a case. Attorneys are given 30 minutes for oral argument, with each side speaking for 15 minutes. During oral argument, judges may – and often do – ask questions of the attorneys as they present their case.

When will we have a decision?

  • There is no specific time by which we will have a decision. Our best estimate is that it will be several months before we have a decision from the 10th Circuit.

What happens next?

  • As always, there are a litany of ways the case could go next. The two most common are (1) we win or (2) we appeal. (1) The 10th Circuit could rule in our favor, and people would again be able to use medians throughout Oklahoma City for a variety of activities including panhandling, selling the Curbside Chronicle, campaigning for a political candidate, gathering signatures for petitions, reporting the news, protesting, jogging, and much more. (2) The 10th Circuit could rule against us, and we would appeal our case to the United States Supreme Court.

Whatever happens, we continue to remain steadfast in our commitment to preserving the Constitution’s promise of liberty for all Oklahomans.

Related Content

News & Commentary
Nov 14, 2019
Placeholder image

Anti-Panhandling Case Headed to the 10th Circuit

On November 19th, our team will be in Denver, CO for oral argument in front of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in McCraw, et al. v. Oklahoma City, our free speech challenge against Oklahoma’s City's anti-panhandling ordinance. This case is about protecting the freedom of speech for Oklahomans.  
News & Commentary
Apr 13, 2016
Placeholder image

ACLU, Legal Aid Services File Federal Lawsuit To Overturn OKC Anti-Panhandling Ordinance

News & Commentary
Dec 07, 2015
ryan

Anti-panhandling Ordinance An Attack On The Poor, ACLU Leader Says

Last Friday, the City of Oklahoma City released a revised version of its proposed anti-panhandling ordinance. A provision of the ordinance would prevent panhandling on medians less than 30 feet wide. The ordinance would make an exception if the median was more than 200 feet away from an intersection. A vote on the proposal is set for Tuesday. ACLU Oklahoma Legal Director Brady Henderson said the ordinance is unnecessary. Existing laws, he said, already regulate panhandling that poses a public safety risk. He said the new ordinance was an attempt by city officials to hide poverty from the public. “All the city is trying to do is sweep poverty under the rug,” Henderson said. “Instead of helping individuals, like the vendors of the Curbside Chronicle, do everything they can to escape poverty, the city is trying to simply force them out of view.” Kiesel said the ACLU O
News & Commentary
Apr 07, 2016
Meg Sayler

Anti-panhandling Ordinance Rebranded After Complaints, Pushback

By Scott CarterEDITORS NOTE: On Nov. 19, 2015, the ACLU of Oklahoma filed an open records request with the city of Oklahoma City, seeking emails and other documents pertaining to the development and passage of an anti-panhandling ordinance written by Ward 6 councilwoman Meg Salyer. On Dec. 4, Assistant Municipal Counselor Richard Smith replied, asking that ACLU Oklahoma further "refine" its request. "I believe we could expedite the process, if you are willing to be more specific as to the type of record you are seeking," Smith wrote. ACLU Oklahoma agreed to extra time for the request. In late January, Oklahoma City officials released 756 pages of documents relating to the ordinance. ACLU of Oklahoma requested copies of 425 pages. Of those 425 documents, about 80 pages were the basis for this story. Many of them can be found in links embedded throughout this story. All 80 pages are available here.